Achat Viagra En Inde, Achat Viagra En Inde.



Achat Viagra En Inde

All Contributions and Statements

General Contributions for the 16 September 2008 open consultations

Association for Progressive Communications (APC) – Comments on the Programme, Agenda and Format of the 2008 IGF Meeting in Hyderabad [pdf]

Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) Contribution to IGF Consultations in Geneva [ pdf ] [ doc ]

ETNO Reflection Document on the Programme, Agenda and Format of the Hyderabad Meeting, ahead of the 3 rd open consultation [pdf]

Global Information Infrastructure Commission (GIIC), Comments for open consultations [ doc ]

ICC-BASIS input on IGF India programme [pdf]

IGF Remote Paticipation Project – Remote Hubs Official Proposal [ pdf ]

Internet Society – Comments on the Program, Agenda and Format of the 2008 IGF Meeting in Hyderabad [pdf ]

IT for Change contribution regarding the agenda and program for IGF’s third meeting in Hyderabad [pdf]

Dynamic Coalition on the Internet Bill of Rights – Statement for IGF Consultations in Geneva [pdf]

Online Collaboration Dynamic Coalition – Statement for IGF Consultations in Geneva [pdf]

David Allen – IGF Multistakeholderism: Wither success? [ pdf ]

General Contributions for the 26 February 2008 open consultations

Interventions made during the 26 February open consultations

Association for Progressive Communications (APC)[ pdf ]

Government of Switzerland – Comments on the second IGF held in Rio de Janeiro in Nov. 2007 and recommendations for future IGF events [ pdf ]

Contributions received for the meeting

Government of the Russian Federation – Comments on the structure and the working procedure of the Advisory Group of the IGF [MsWord]

Government of the United States of America – Contribution of United States to IGF Preparatory Meeting – [MsWord]

Government of India – Presentation on the 2008 meeting venue [ pdf ] [ ppt ]

ICC-BASIS Reflections – contribution on the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Rio, November 2007. [ pdf ]

Internet Society (ISOC) – contribution to the Internet Governance Forum Open Consultations [ pdf ]

European Telecommunications Network Operators’ Association (ETNO)

ETNO Reflection Document in reply to the IGF Questionnaire “Taking stock and the way forward” [ pdf ]

ETNO Reflection Document on the IGF Advisory Group [ pdf ]

Association for Progressive Communications (APC)

Statement from the Association for Progressive Communications (APC) on the second Internet Governance Forum, Rio de Janeiro, November 12-15 2007 [ English-pdf ], [ Français-pdf ], [ Español-pdf ]

Building Consensus on Internet Access at the Internet Governance Forum [ pdf ]

Information Technology Association of America – Input on Internet Governance Forum IGF Rio 2007 and Plans for IGF New Delhi 2008 Preliminary Comments [MsWord]

International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) – Sustainable Development , Theme Proposal for IGF New Delhi [ pdf ]

Global Information Infrastructure Commission (GIIC) – Comments for the 26 February consultations [ MsWord ]

Internet Governance Caucus (IGC)

Format of IGF, Hyderabad [ pdf ]

Main Session Themes for IGF, Hyderabad [ pdf ]

Renewal / Restructuring of Multi-stakeholder Advisory Group [ pdf ]

Veni Markovski – Internet Governance: the issue, the myths, the problems, the solutions [ pdf ]

Contributions made through the Web form [html]

Interventions and Statements concerning the 3rd round of consultations in preparation of the second IGF, 5 September 2007

Contributions for 23 May Consultations to discuss programme and agenda for the second meeting of the IGF in Rio de Janeiro.

Interventions made during the 2nd round of consultations on the convening of the IGF, 19 May 2006.

Comments on the proposed multistakeholder group.

Interventions made during the first consultations on the convening of the IGF 16 -17 February 2006.

(All contributions are posted in the form that they are received).

The opinions expressed in submissions posted on this website are those of the authors and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting those, or carrying the endorsement of the IGF Secretariat. The IGF Secretariat does not guarantee the accuracy of any statement included in any submission. Any geographic designation employed does not imply the expression of any opinion concerning the legal status of any country, territory or other area or of its authorities on the part of the IGF Secretariat. Mention of firm names does not imply the endorsement of the IGF Secretariat.